Inquiry: ‘I hoped he would drop his weapon,’ SQ officer testifies

Article content material

The police officer who tried to speak with 17-year-old Riley Fairholm minutes earlier than he was killed testified on Tuesday that he tried to persuade the teenager to drop his gun, however that Fairholm continued waving it round whereas transferring nearer to police.

Article content material

Fairholm was shot within the head by a Sûreté du Québec officer in an deserted parking zone within the Jap Townships municipality of Lac-Brome simply after 1 a.m. on July 25, 2018, a couple of minute after police arrived on scene. It was later found the teenager was mentally distraught, that he had known as 911 himself and that his weapon was a pellet gun.

A coroner’s inquest into Fairholm’s loss of life started with testimony by his mom on the Sherbrooke courthouse on Monday. On Tuesday, Coroner Géhane Kamel heard from three of the six SQ officers who participated within the intervention.

“I hoped he would drop his weapon, and I knew that there have been solely three outcomes,” mentioned SQ Sgt. Wallace McGovern, who testified first. “I knew that he would both drop his weapon, he would begin capturing at us, or the way in which that he was appearing and pointing in direction of us … anyone would cease the risk.”

Article content material

McGovern testified that Fairholm, who was pacing backward and forward, appeared to grow to be extra aggressive and was transferring nearer to police.

“He was transferring in direction of us at a substantial charge, greater than I felt snug with,” he mentioned.

One other SQ officer, who’s scheduled to testify on Wednesday, then shot Fairholm, in keeping with varied testimonies.

SQ agent Geneviève Racine, who was in the identical automobile as McGovern throughout the intervention, testified she was behind her automobile door pointing her gun at Fairholm in centre mass when two officers within the automobile to her proper exited the automobile and communicated with Fairholm earlier than one shot at him.

That’s when Fairholm grew to become a sufferer as a substitute of a suspect, Racine mentioned.

“There are specific info that permit me consider that the particular person was gravely injured,” she mentioned. “To the most effective of my reminiscence, it was apparent he had a head damage, and I requested one in all my co-workers to get me a primary support equipment. … I attempted to cease the hemorrhaging and we tried to discover a pulse on the person, tried to wake him up so he may reply us.”

Article content material

Kamel requested why Racine didn’t carry out CPR on Fairholm, who was later pronounced lifeless in hospital. Racine mentioned they had been capable of finding a pulse at first, and that paramedics arrived shortly and took over first support.

“My curiosity right here … is that little one,” Kamel mentioned. “I inform myself that possibly we’d have had a small likelihood to deliver him again if we had completed CPR.”

Fairholm’s loss of life was investigated by the Bureau des enquêtes indépendantes (BEI), after which Quebec’s workplace of prison prosecutions (DPCP) mentioned within the fall of 2019 no prices could be laid as a result of officers concerned within the incident had adopted the legislation. The DPCP mentioned Fairholm may have fired at any second since he refused to drop his weapon.

In 2021, Fairholm’s household determined to file a lawsuit towards the drive and the officer who fired the gun. It states the police intervention ought to have handled Fairholm as a susceptible one who was in disaster — he had proven indicators of suicidal ideation earlier than the occasion — and that officers ought to have tried to de-escalate the state of affairs.

Article content material

Talking just for himself, McGovern, who was the supervising officer the evening Fairholm was shot, testified on Tuesday that beneath the circumstances, he doesn’t understand how he may have reacted in another way.

“Very calmly I informed him to drop his weapon and that it will be OK if he dropped his weapon,” he mentioned, including that was all the time the purpose of the intervention. “I repeated this not less than 3 times.”

McGovern was requested whether or not police coaching allowed him to answer such conditions adequately. He mentioned he’s accomplished periods that embody varied situations involving firearms, and that he was taught to make use of drive step by step.

“Normally the primary aspect is the police presence with the uniform, and verbal,” he mentioned. “And because the risk to the police go up, then our use of drive will go up in accordance.”

Article content material

“The current state of affairs, if I’d adopted my coaching 100 per cent, I in all probability would have been the one to shoot him,” McGovern added. “The hazard was there, the chance was there.”

McGovern mentioned there was no approach to know if Fairholm was suicidal or what he deliberate to do with the weapon.

“In a state of affairs the place there’s a firearm, the primary precedence is the safety of the people,” he mentioned. “I didn’t have any data if it was an individual that was suicidal or an individual that was bent on doing hurt.”

The inquest is scheduled to proceed Wednesday with testimonies from the three different SQ officers concerned within the intervention in addition to a paramedic.

[email protected]

twitter.com/katelynthomas